So I finished Wikinomics yesterday - while mowing the runaway lawn - thanks for the audio loan, Josh :-)
Do some of you want to get together sometime soon to discuss over a coffee?
I thought this was a great suggestion for reading... a very optimistic book; made me excited about where
we're headed. The "yes, but...." argumentative streak in me has a few questions too, though... sometimes I wonder whether all the promises of near-limitless wiki-fostered-prosperity aren't a bit of a Ponzi-scheme. After all, we're not making new people, or extra time. In other words, the global talent pool *is* finite. In the old model, an employee would give 100% (or close) of their energy to their employer. In the new flattened wiki model, that may no longer be true, and the problem solving will often cross institutional boundaries.... but the net sum of the problem-solving capacity is still the same, no? What company A gains from outside input it will loose again as its own workers now contribute to company B. I know, there are huge gains through efficiency and motivation - but are these exponential? Limitless? Aren't the real winners (such as the Gold Corp example , and perhaps even some web 2.0 companies) the ones who manage to get more from the global community than they are contributing back?
So - there's a first talking point to get a discussion going. Coffee, anyone?
Speaking of books - how about this one for a future discussion:
"Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives" - came out last month and is authored by the folks at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School
Recent Comments